NO SIGNIFICANT CRASH RISKS WHILE OPERATING MOBILE

NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL RESPONDS TO ARRL: NO EVIDENCE OF
"SIGNIFICANT CRASH RISKS" WHILE OPERATING MOBILE



ARRL President Joel Harrison, W5ZN, wrote a letter to National Safety
Council (NSC) President Janet Froetscher in July expressing the ARRL's
concerns that Amateur Radio not become an unintended victim of the
growing public debate over what to do about distracted drivers
<http://www.arrl.org/news/files/NSC_Letter7-30-09.pdf>. Froetscher has
now replied, saying the NSC does not support bans or prohibitions on the
use of Amateur Radios while driving
<http://www.arrl.org/news/files/NSC_Response_to_ARRL.pdf>.
Noting that there is significant evidence that talking on cell phones
while driving poses crash risk four times that of other drivers,
Froetscher observed that the NSC position calling for bans on the use of
cell phones while driving is grounded in science. "We are not aware of
evidence that using Amateur Radios while driving has significant crash
risks," Froetscher wrote in her August 24 letter. "We also have no
evidence that using two-way radios while driving poses significant crash
risks. Until such time as compelling, peer-reviewed scientific research
is presented that denotes significant risks associated with the use of
Amateur Radios, two-way radios or other communication devices, the NSC
does not support legislative bans or prohibition on their use."
Froetscher said that while "the specific risk of radio use while driving
is unmeasured and likely does not approach that of cell phones, there
indeed is some elevated risk to the drivers, their passengers and the
public associated with 650,000 Amateur Radio operators who may not, at
one time or another, not concentrate fully on their driving." She points
out that the "best safety practice is to have one's full attention on
their driving, their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road.
Drivers who engage in any activity that impairs any of these constitutes
an increased risk."
ARRL Chief Executive Officer David Sumner, K1ZZ, said the ARRL
"appreciates NSC President and CEO Janet Froetscher's clear statement
that the NSC does not support legislative bans or prohibitions on the
use of Amateur Radio while driving. We applaud the NSC for taking
positions that are grounded in science. At the same time, all radio
amateurs should heed her call to concentrate fully on driving while
behind the wheel. It is possible to operate a motor vehicle safely while
using Amateur Radio, but if it becomes a distraction we owe it those
with whom we share the road, as well as to our passengers, to put safety
first."
On January 30, 2009, the ARRL Executive Committee adopted the ARRL's
Policy Statement on Mobile Amateur Radio Operation
<http://www.arrl.org/govrelations/MobileAmateurRadioPolicyStatement.pdf>
that states "Amateur Radio mobile operation is ubiquitous, and Amateur
Radio emergency and public service communications, and other organized
Amateur Radio communications activities and networks necessitate
operation of equipment while some licensees are driving motor vehicles.
Two-way radio use is dissimilar from full-duplex cellular telephone
communications because the operator spends little time actually
transmitting; the time spent listening is more similar to, and arguably
less distracting than, listening to a broadcast radio, CD or MP3 player.
There are no distinctions to be made between or among Amateur Radio,
public safety land mobile radio, private land mobile radio or citizen's
radio in terms of driver distraction. All are distinguishable from
mobile cellular telephone communications in this respect. Nevertheless,
ARRL encourages licensees to conduct Amateur communications from motor
vehicles in a manner that does not detract from the safe and attentive
operation of a motor vehicle at all times."
In his letter, Harrison explained to Froetscher that Amateur Radio
operators provide essential emergency communications when regular
communications channels are disrupted by disaster: "Through formal
agreements with federal agencies, such as the National Weather Service,
FEMA and private relief organizations, the Amateur Radio volunteers
protect lives using their own equipment without compensation. The
ability of hams to communicate and help protect the lives of those in
danger would be strictly hindered if the federal, state and local
governments to not ensure that Amateur Radio operators can continue the
use of their mobile radios while on the road."
Froetscher replied that she "appreciate[s] your focus of Amateur Radio
for emergency communications during disasters. I encourage ARRL to adopt
best practices for the safe operation of vehicles that confines use of
Amateur Radios while driving only to disaster emergencies."
The Policy Statement asserts that the ARRL "is aware of no evidence that
[mobile] operation contributes to driver inattention. Quite the
contrary: Radio amateurs are public service-minded individuals who
utilize their radio-equipped motor vehicles to assist others, and they
are focused on driving in the execution of that function."